Marcus Anhäuser: Esowatch.com for product placement? Morality, double standards & Co. It's been a couple of years ago that the German Press together with President Gustav W. Heinemann a Press Code adopted. Pursuant to paragraph 6 and 7, journalists are invited here to separate advertising and editorial and to refrain from activities that could jeopardize the credibility of the press in question. we believe a recent article on the free-H.Blog journalists Anhäuser Marcus, it seems the author of the blog placebo alarm Paragraph 6, 7 but also paragraph 1 of the Press Code to be interpreted very flexibly. His 2009 article published in Der Spiegel "When patients rinse their own bile" contains a reference to the portal and web link Esowatch.com whose editors Marcus Anhäuser is closely associated. Criticism points to hidden advertising is also because Esowatch.com working at the limits of Internet-crime . Claus H. Fritzsche writes about this in the blog: "In September 2009 the strange article published SPIEGLER ONLINE
" When patients rinse their own bile " Marcus Anhäuser . This entry breaks my opinion, in serious breach of ethical standards to be followed by journalists:
conflict of interest: created for me the impression that Marcus is close Anhäuser the Editorial team of the website and has Esowatch.com here intentionally surreptitious advertising. It is surely no coincidence that Marcus Anhäuser
Follower of Esowatch micro-blog at Twitter is.
"small favors" this type, including web link to the appreciation of the PageRank, for me, are a clear violation of Paragraph 1, 6 and 7 of the Press Code of the German Press Council.
misleading: The Germans from the Medical Wochenschrift (DMW) case study would have taken over for Marcus Anhäuser may be reason to present serious sources of consumer health information
and activities such as the MS-
Journal Club to present the University of Hamburg. The presented by Anhäuser portal Esowatch.com but provides exactly the opposite of evidence-based patient information. See also the following products in H. Blog (
Esowatch in Munchausen test ) and
GWUP.WATCH .
crime The anonymous editor of the portal Esowatch.com work in my estimation in the border area to cybercrime. An extreme example of character assassination is Esowatch the entry on
Simone K. (O-Ton:
"psychiatric treatment she has also" ). The article's Discussion and history was erased after a critical GWUP.WATCH report. However, there are copies of original documents: here, the defamatory article
(2007 to 2009 online) and here the interesting discussion
Esowatch the anonymous authors.
who studies the debate at rest, open to the emotional depths. "
Source: H. Blog (12.02.2010) ... put on 26/02/2010 Claus Fritzsche after another and summarized the entire controversy in the following blog post: Dangerous surreptitious: Marcus Anhäuser, SPIEGEL ONLINE and Esowatch Anhäuser-censorship: sexy Especially here is the screenshot of the Blog
placebo alarm (ScienceBlogs) discussion. Marcus Anhäuser deleted a comment from Claus Fritzsche, which this "According to a prior censorship ... censorship:
http://bit.ly/d7ZlsM " under the slogan immediately turned to the Internet.
. About the association GWUP eV: ass Watch:
wiki entry "GWUP" .
Visit our presentation and see our portfolio at UID Surface up close! We look forward to meeting you! 
Visit our presentation and see our portfolio at UID Surface up close! We look forward to meeting you! 
