Quotes To Put On Wedding Favors

GWUP-POV in Wikipedia

The site skeptizismus.de warns: "To be credible, present themselves" skeptics "organizations in the course of their public self-presentation to the outside world often described as" representatives of science, "" neutral observer "or even as "unbiased". Again and again, falling for example, journalists fall for this facade, behind which lies a closer look reveals little. " (1) In reality, the" skeptics "movement, according skeptizismus.de contrast, "a closed ideological system."



Whether Scientology , Germanic New Medicine or so-called skeptics , the free encyclopedia Wikipedia exerts ideological groups on a magical appeal. And so it's no surprise that by the "skeptics" movement is a great effort, his own ideology as POV (2) bring to violence within Wikipedia advantage. Here are some inspirations on "GWUP and Wikipedia:


Wikipedia user fossa on the GWUP:
"Hi, I have a link or equipped with a GWUP source opinion away from the article. The reason is as follows: The GWUP is organized against their name rather than a scientific professional organization, but an association of activists of the skeptics movement. The fact that mainly academics, including scientists, have joined forces in the GWUP changes nothing: they do not appear here as a scientist, but as activists. The views of such ideological associations are to be reflected only in exceptional cases when they have such as churches, unions or ADAC has a high visibility, NPOV be attributed as such religious opinion and shown separately at the end of the article: and then have referred WP. The GWUP is not such an exceptional case, her position must therefore be just like the Scientology, the EAP or the toddlers' group Graz-Süd, did not play. He can not even alternative reputabele as source function , should a lack of scientific or journalistic sources "

Full Article.
Wikipedia: User Fossa / GWUP


Wikipedia user Penta on GWUP:
"... Because for a number of those "skeptics" to some degree justifies the ends justify the means in the sense of their "struggle against the paranormal." I have repeatedly assured several members of the GWUP that they consider irrelevant and arguments (Preview on emotions, cynicism, etc.) to be legitimate, to oppose the "paranormal" to compete. This can go up to the deliberate concealment of any "troublesome" information. During a meeting planned by the GWUP to the suggestion by Rudolf Henke and me too "pro" agents (so common in the GWUP technical term, by the way, already implies that the GWUP always "against") as speakers should be invited to conduct an objective and constructive dialogue, I commented to, for example, the CEO of GWUP, Amardeo Sarma that one should not invite a particular speaker rather, as the presentation of his study (Sarma yet at this point even was not known) may be so good and so accurate would appear that the "skeptics" of GWUP could think of no more arguments about it ... "

Full Article:
Wikipedia: User Penta GWUP


H. Blog: Wikipedia, agitprop and Nina Gerlach
"In three articles of this weblog previously reported on the suspicion that the Paul-Ehrlich Institute in Langen working molecular biologist Nina Gerlach, August 2006-July 2007 member of the board of Wikimedia Germany eV, their influence within Wikipedia for aggressive political agitation abused. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate to existing allegations with specific examples and to allow outsiders a good look behind the scenes of the online encyclopedia ...

The behavioral signature of Nina Gerlach
The practices described here are only the tip of the iceberg. Once you get used to the trouble, the many controversies study with Nina in detail, the following finds it regularly recurring features:

first Authoritarian second act takes you
Aggressive accusations instead of talk
third Defective items
4th Questionable sources
5th High Konfliktfreudigkeit ... "

Full Article:
Wikipedia, agitprop and Nina Gerlach H. Blog: Homeopathy & Research

(Nina Gerlach - user name" Nina "- is active in Wikipedia as a kind of patron saint for the Wikipedia article "GWUP" (3) . It provides a regular basis here for GWUP-friendly displays and eliminates GWUP criticism consistently)

Nina Gerlach.
Wikipedia: Mediation Committee / problems between Nina and Michael S (PDF copy of the H. Blog)
photo of Nina Gerlach
Nina Gerlach at Twitter
.
.
NEW: GWUP network in Wikipedia
data collection: Wikipedia user of the skeptics movement (GWUP, Brights Germany, Esowatch.com)
(a sporadically updated Collection of Wikipedia user name)
.
.
About the Association GWUP eV:
ass Watch: wiki entry "GWUP"
.

Army Hiv Test Result Times

Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger and Esowatch: legal, illegal, damn

------------------ ---------------------- CORRECTION FIRST
correction from 09.04.2010:
The corrected this blog entry was posted on 01.05.2009. It corresponds to the then state of knowledge about the portal Esowatch.com . At the time, was found, EsoWatch worthy of criticism, some constructive and valuable element representations. In the last round 12 months has developed the project but to an illegal, militant, primitive, lowest human instincts of hatred and appealing Denunziationsportal. The platform is also used to commit some serious internet crime .

Here are three case studies:

Contender: EsoWatch of Simone Küstermann (Quote EsoWatch: "psychiatric treatment she has also" )

Contender: EsoWatch about Jocelyne Lopez ( Quote EsoWatch: "means talk opponents as Nazis and Gestapo thugs, as hate preachers, professional Holocaust victims, radical Jews, etc. ")

Infringement: Hundreds of photos published by EsoWatch illegal as piracy below (press) agency photos and pictures from scientific reference books

The alleged master- administrator of the Wiki (pseudonyms: Thomas and Thomas Xavier X) and from the perspective of GWUP.WATCH also legally responsible initiator of the project is known. For more information see the blog Promed.Watch . or in Wiki article Klaus Ramstöck in donkey watch.
.
cyber crime:
Ulrich Berger is strongly suspected to cooperate actively with managers and authors of the anonymous internet pillory EsoWatch.com, under investigation by the German justice since summer 2010 is . EselWatch.com has in his wiki article Ulrich Berger (GWUP) in November 2010 began to document evidence and evidence in this regard.
------------------ ------------------------- END CORRECTION -

FROM OLD BLOG CONTRIBUTION FROM 01.05.2009:

Since 8 April 2009 GWUP.WATCH in several comments, the strange web activity from Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger of the Vienna University of Economics critically. The aim was to first clear evidence in favor of online bullying (1) . Furthermore, the participation of Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger in a smear campaign (2) identified, directed against the noted social and medical epidemiologist Prof. Dr. Stefan Willich (3) from the University Hospital of the Berlin Charité. Today it is a question whether Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger cooperated with the illegal bullying portal Esowatch.



The good news first: Esowatch or better EsoWatch.com is an interesting and in parts quite valuable Web project. Who attended Esowatch, welcomed with a friendly "Welcome to the Wiki of irrational belief systems" . He learns that informs Esowatch including on pseudo-scientific methods of healing, (brown) Age, quacks and charlatans. Various Esowatch items are valuable and worth reading for the sake of education and consumer protection means.

But now the bad news: Those who study only the Esowatch Wiki, and the associated Eso blog, the dark side of this web project hidden.

first Line loyalty authors: Unlike Wikipedia is a collaboration on the wiki Esowatch not free. To be eligible authors who have proven themselves in "Autorenaussieb and labor board (4) tried and true as a line (" suitable for us, "). Subordinates who are not disciplined and offend, which is a less friendly "croaked her complete idiots" welcomed.

2. "Skeptics and Atheists: The authors are only authorized persons who are close to the so-called" skeptics "movement (5) and atheism. How to GWUP.WATCH but also in the scientific documentation "The skeptics Syndrome" (6) the sociologist Edgar miracle can read easily, it is about ideology, dogmatism and fundamentalism. The few women and many men are very similar to the objects of their criticism, but only at the opposite sign.

third wiki as a weapon : Objective of Esowatch Wiki is not to present issues objectively and impartially. How Esowatch-author and expert Fake (7) [ Addendum: this site of an alleged member of the Esowatch Editor team has now been removed to clear the tracks probably] Thomas Xavier the weblog of Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger admits frankly, it's about to fight people and perspectives and to denounce it. Thomas Xavier commented on 23 April 2008 "Mr. Froberg, you will be a case for Esowatch" (8) . A Freudian slip, it gets to the point. The Esowatch Wiki is regarded by its authors as a weapon. The sentence "Mrs. Merkel, you are a case for Wikipedia" would actually make sense.

4th Pseudo science: set According to the sociologist Edgar Wunder "skeptics" like a word like "pseudo science" as fighting words to stigmatize dissenters and save the tedious explanations (of allegations). As the H. in his blog Kommentat "Esowatch.com in Munchausen review: Acupuncture" (9) demonstrates vividly that Esowatch authors publish, however, even "junk science" in pure culture.

5th Militancy: have Esowatch-authors it is not as constructive discussion culture. The blog documented in H. errors (gerac studies, attitude of health insurance) have not been corrected. Instead, try the H.Blog-author with the character assassination page claus-fritzsche.com and fake comments on pornography sites (10) (under very limited opportunities intellekueller) was to "punish". As chance would have it, the character assassination and the Esowatch domain, both the same - hosted provider MediaOne - not widespread. Presumed editor of the website is character assassination from the perspective of large GWUP.WATCH Probability of the Internet as Thomas Xavier Thomas or X occurring person.

6th Violations of law: Esowatch contrary heavily against § 186 StGB (Slander), § 187 of the Criminal Code (defamation) and copyright (§ 97 UrhG). To stitch the Esowatch authors is it that they quote selectively correct information (biased inflate and distorting play) and occasionally in small doses deliberately spreading false information. With few exceptions, all photos are stolen. So it is not surprising that Esowatch since March 2009 in government investigation Germany is involved. To add item to style style and perk up, are shown Esowatch people like to descriptions such as wrong in Nazi circles or is Holocaust deniers provided. While this is demonstrably false as, for example in the case of the philosopher Helmut Heilbronner Hille.

7th Targeted illusion Esowatch authors are like snipers who attack people out of anonymity out sneaky, without (false) to take responsibility for their statements. An example: The Esowatch article "Atlas medicine (11) was active with probability Participation of Prof. Dr. Martin Lambeck (12) written. Esowatch conceals important here for Lambeck very embarrassing information in the (deliberately cited) Article "pseudo-science at times to know: The" healer can test "by Prof. Martin Lambeck ..." be found. The statement on Esowatch-Pils glass experiment is a deliberate misrepresentation. The so-called beer glass experiment worked in the presence of Lambeck, which can also be found in the magazine know time 4 / 2006 on page 83. The successful interpretation of the beer glass experiment by Lambeck ("coupled oscillation") was incorrect.

8th Creativity: As the case of the most foolhardy Esowatch record shows on the publisher Simone Küstermann , shy away Esowatch authors do not invent denunciatory information freely. Simone Küstermann the period 07/03/2007 to 02/12/2009 imputed statement "psychiatric experience, she also has" (has since been deleted) is based solely on a conjecture and misinterpretation of an alleged Küstermann-citation in an Internet Forum. After publication of a critical contribution GWUP.WATCH Esowatch has deleted the article history to cover up evidence. A copy of the key authors discussion shows that Esowatch authors here without any information, a psychiatry resident fictitious or brandishing what Simone Küstermann defamed two years wrong until it was deleted.

Now for the interesting question: Cooperates Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger with Esowatch ? In his old and new lists Weblog Ulrichsberger the Eso Blog of Esowatch-publisher in his blogroll. The first is just a sign of sympathy (and ideological conformity). Who wants to learn whether and how Ulrich Berger cooperates with Esowatch that would once and : normally the results of Google search "Ulrich Berger esowatch.com site" "Esowatch site: www.scienceblogs.de / critical-thinking" work through .

Here are many indications of a very close cooperation between Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger and Esowatch . An example to illustrate this: The press release
staff Wolfgang Weitlaner an article published in 2007 (13) in which he sharply criticized Ulrich Berger for being in a published article in the standard terms, such as homeopathy, acupuncture and Gerd Ryke Hamer undifferentiated and without a viable source of information lumps and from the perspective of Weitlaner is biased. Ulrich Berger is also slightly built, and responds in December 2007 with the words:

"Or in this press release. Released by the false information was the press text editor Wolfgang Weitlaner, a relevantly well-known New Age friend and a great fan of my comments. (Also from that?) " (14)

Instead of objectively address the argument Weitlaner, Wolfgang Berger takes Weitlaner personally, derogatory and stigmatizing. Ulrich Berger does not swap the facts and the controversy concerning arguments and argued (as so often) only ad hominem (15) . Personal attacks are a stylistic device, which runs like a thread through many blog comments by Ulrich Berger. As luck would have it displayed to coincide with the Weitlaner critique of Ulrich Berger Esowatch an article about Wolfgang Weitlaner (16) the way to the Internet. The sources stated refer to verbal contributions by Ulrich Berger. Thomas free after Xavier can be said that Esowatch authors learned of Ulrich Berger, who is a case for Esowatch ...

The game of ties between Univ. Prof. Dr. Ulrich Berger and Esowatch works beautifully and is only surpassed by the co-operation with Berger's friends at ScienceBlogs .
.
About the Association GWUP eV:
ass Watch: wiki entry "GWUP"
.