Quotes To Put On Wedding Favors

GWUP-POV in Wikipedia

The site skeptizismus.de warns: "To be credible, present themselves" skeptics "organizations in the course of their public self-presentation to the outside world often described as" representatives of science, "" neutral observer "or even as "unbiased". Again and again, falling for example, journalists fall for this facade, behind which lies a closer look reveals little. " (1) In reality, the" skeptics "movement, according skeptizismus.de contrast, "a closed ideological system."



Whether Scientology , Germanic New Medicine or so-called skeptics , the free encyclopedia Wikipedia exerts ideological groups on a magical appeal. And so it's no surprise that by the "skeptics" movement is a great effort, his own ideology as POV (2) bring to violence within Wikipedia advantage. Here are some inspirations on "GWUP and Wikipedia:


Wikipedia user fossa on the GWUP:
"Hi, I have a link or equipped with a GWUP source opinion away from the article. The reason is as follows: The GWUP is organized against their name rather than a scientific professional organization, but an association of activists of the skeptics movement. The fact that mainly academics, including scientists, have joined forces in the GWUP changes nothing: they do not appear here as a scientist, but as activists. The views of such ideological associations are to be reflected only in exceptional cases when they have such as churches, unions or ADAC has a high visibility, NPOV be attributed as such religious opinion and shown separately at the end of the article: and then have referred WP. The GWUP is not such an exceptional case, her position must therefore be just like the Scientology, the EAP or the toddlers' group Graz-Süd, did not play. He can not even alternative reputabele as source function , should a lack of scientific or journalistic sources "

Full Article.
Wikipedia: User Fossa / GWUP


Wikipedia user Penta on GWUP:
"... Because for a number of those "skeptics" to some degree justifies the ends justify the means in the sense of their "struggle against the paranormal." I have repeatedly assured several members of the GWUP that they consider irrelevant and arguments (Preview on emotions, cynicism, etc.) to be legitimate, to oppose the "paranormal" to compete. This can go up to the deliberate concealment of any "troublesome" information. During a meeting planned by the GWUP to the suggestion by Rudolf Henke and me too "pro" agents (so common in the GWUP technical term, by the way, already implies that the GWUP always "against") as speakers should be invited to conduct an objective and constructive dialogue, I commented to, for example, the CEO of GWUP, Amardeo Sarma that one should not invite a particular speaker rather, as the presentation of his study (Sarma yet at this point even was not known) may be so good and so accurate would appear that the "skeptics" of GWUP could think of no more arguments about it ... "

Full Article:
Wikipedia: User Penta GWUP


H. Blog: Wikipedia, agitprop and Nina Gerlach
"In three articles of this weblog previously reported on the suspicion that the Paul-Ehrlich Institute in Langen working molecular biologist Nina Gerlach, August 2006-July 2007 member of the board of Wikimedia Germany eV, their influence within Wikipedia for aggressive political agitation abused. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate to existing allegations with specific examples and to allow outsiders a good look behind the scenes of the online encyclopedia ...

The behavioral signature of Nina Gerlach
The practices described here are only the tip of the iceberg. Once you get used to the trouble, the many controversies study with Nina in detail, the following finds it regularly recurring features:

first Authoritarian second act takes you
Aggressive accusations instead of talk
third Defective items
4th Questionable sources
5th High Konfliktfreudigkeit ... "

Full Article:
Wikipedia, agitprop and Nina Gerlach H. Blog: Homeopathy & Research

(Nina Gerlach - user name" Nina "- is active in Wikipedia as a kind of patron saint for the Wikipedia article "GWUP" (3) . It provides a regular basis here for GWUP-friendly displays and eliminates GWUP criticism consistently)

Nina Gerlach.
Wikipedia: Mediation Committee / problems between Nina and Michael S (PDF copy of the H. Blog)
photo of Nina Gerlach
Nina Gerlach at Twitter
.
.
NEW: GWUP network in Wikipedia
data collection: Wikipedia user of the skeptics movement (GWUP, Brights Germany, Esowatch.com)
(a sporadically updated Collection of Wikipedia user name)
.
.
About the Association GWUP eV:
ass Watch: wiki entry "GWUP"
.