There are mortal sins, which may never commit a science journalist. It should not be emotionally involved with a subject about which he should be "neutral" report. He was to forge a scientific controversy never campaigns against a party which he intended to represent an objective and fair. And he himself should assume the role of experts with its "expertise" Stammtisch-level or less. From the perspective of fish GWUP.WATCH Blog Editor Lars Fischer with his commentary "homeopathy at the University of Magdeburg" against the three principles mentioned here has failed.
"I want my homeopathy article on page 1 of Google search for" University of Magdeburg "creates. Right now he is on p.2, " Lars Fischer writes on 20 October 2009 for Twitter. A strange tweet. Strange because, Lars Fischer presented to the public as a science journalist. Strange, because Lars Fischer here gives the impression that to commit mortal sins listed above, a science journalist.
Imagine again, Jan Schweitzer, chief editor of the magazine time would know about swine flu a prior aggression only as dripping critical online article about the Robert Leave Koch Institute to in the next breath to announce on Twitter: "Me, that my swine flu article on page 1 of Google search for "Robert Koch Institute," creates. Right now he is on p. 2. " An immediate warning of the time publisher would likely result. In repeating January Schweitzer would probably lose his job.
strange is that Lars Fischer here pretty much leaning out the window, although its subject-specific expertise Stammtisch-level does not significantly exceed. Get the whole story in H.Blog article:
Lars Fischer in Munchausen review: "Homeopathy at the University of Magdeburg" (FISH BLOG at Scilogs.de)
continuation of this article at:
dogmatism: Lars Fischer (fish blog), Fabian Seyfried and intellectual overload.
0 comments:
Post a Comment