probably know that all who work for decades for some topics, such as sustainability, "We doubt sometimes whether the many meetings, the talk, publications, appeals and the congresses any positive effect in terms of a critical have majorities in our society.
on a large convention in this Spring I made an interesting observation. The event was aimed at the same occupational group, which has also been at a conference 12 years ago.
were twelve years ago the votes in Parliament yet linked throughout a neoliberal perspective. Only in person backstage was talking about doubts in the system. Open criticism was apparently still too gefährlich'und would probably have a negative impact on their future careers.
Unlike this spring: Critical Voices in Parliament were more the rule than the exception. The content on personal conversations has changed. It no longer went to the diffuse doubts the system and a cautious, almost conspiratorial scan of the other person looking for confirmation.
But came to the meetings at the dining table concrete alternatives to the center. While this was partly designated as a "utopian" or "difficult to implement." But they were discussed but encouraged.
It appears in the mainstream so when I take my subjective observations seriously to move something. Although very, very slowly. After the private desertification with the system, which was felt in the nineties, now the active, albeit tentative search for possible alternatives.
What is probably the next step?
0 comments:
Post a Comment